Douglas v. Russo

21 So. 2d 536, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 334
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 4, 1945
DocketNo. 269l.
StatusPublished

This text of 21 So. 2d 536 (Douglas v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas v. Russo, 21 So. 2d 536, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 334 (La. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Bea v. Russo and Douglas and Wife v. Russo, La. App., 21 So.2d 530, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the lower Court be and the same is hereby reversed, and judgment is rendered herein in favor of Penny Douglas (or Junion Douglas) for the use and benefit of his minor son, Will Douglas (or Junion Will Douglas), and against Tony Russo in the sum of $250, and in favor of Mrs. Penny Douglas and against Tony Russo in the sum of $400, with legal interest on both sums from date of judicial demand until paid. The defendant is to pay all costs in both Courts. *Page 633

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bea v. Russo
21 So. 2d 530 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 So. 2d 536, 1945 La. App. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-russo-lactapp-1945.