Douglas v. Hardin

131 S.E. 896, 161 Ga. 838, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 343
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 1926
DocketNo. 4834
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 S.E. 896 (Douglas v. Hardin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas v. Hardin, 131 S.E. 896, 161 Ga. 838, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 343 (Ga. 1926).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The lengthy document that in the bill of exceptions is treated as a motion to dismiss the motion for a new trial, which merely states specified “objections of defendants to the motion for new trial as amended, and to the so-called brief of the evidence approved and filed June 30th, 1923,”. does not show cause for dismissing the motion for new trial.

2. This case is within the general rule (Civil Code, § 6204) that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed, where the verdict was not demanded by the law and the facts.

Judgment affirmed.'

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodgen v. Fowler
147 S.E. 775 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 896, 161 Ga. 838, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-hardin-ga-1926.