Dodgen v. Fowler

147 S.E. 775, 39 Ga. App. 515, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 388
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 9, 1929
Docket19374
StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E. 775 (Dodgen v. Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodgen v. Fowler, 147 S.E. 775, 39 Ga. App. 515, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 388 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in the record being in sharp conflict as to material matters, this case comes within the rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed when the verdict is not demanded by the law and the facts. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Douglas v. Hardin, 161 Ga. 838 (2) (131 S. E. 896); Carr v. Carr, 157 Ga. 208 (121 S. E. 227) ; Parks v. Stevens, 21 Ga. App. 180 (94 S. E. 60) ; Louisville, & Nashville R. Co. v. Barksdale, 34 Ga. App. 812 (131 S. E. 298).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. John T. Dorsey, John G. Bell, Morris, Hawlcins & Wallace, for plaintiffs in error. Mozley & Gann, L. M. Blair, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carr v. Carr
121 S.E. 227 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Douglas v. Hardin
131 S.E. 896 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Parks v. Stevens
94 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barksdale
131 S.E. 298 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.E. 775, 39 Ga. App. 515, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodgen-v-fowler-gactapp-1929.