Douglas v. Fulda
This text of 54 Cal. 589 (Douglas v. Fulda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment was both rendered and entered more than a year before the appeal was taken. The appeal from the judgment, therefore, must be dismissed.
The order denying a new trial must be affirmed. • There are no specifications of the particulars in which the evidence was insufficient, and no error of law occurring at the trial was insisted on at the argument here.
At the hearing of the motion to retax costs, the facts were found by the Court below, after reading the affidavits filed by both parties. We are satisfied with that finding.
The transcript is subject to many of the objections referred to in deciding Douglas v. Fulda (54 Cal. 588.)
Appeal from judgment dismissed and orders affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Cal. 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-fulda-cal-1880.