Douglas v. City Of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 2, 2022·No. 1:18-cv-09327·Unknown

Opinion

ere ee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT HPCECPRONICAL LY □□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | oe □□□ □□ | GREGORY DOUGLAS, | [DATE FILED. of | 242033 | Plaintiff, -against- 18 CIVIL 9327 (KPF) JUDGMENT CITY OF NEW YORK and C.O. CAROL GARCIA, Shield No. 17515, Defendants. penne eee eee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 1, 2022, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in full. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 2, 2022

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: (A Deputy □

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. City Of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Douglas v. City Of New York (Douglas v. City Of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)