Douglas Park Jockey Club v. Commissioner

9 B.T.A. 496, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2563
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedDecember 9, 1927
DocketDocket No. 5738.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 B.T.A. 496 (Douglas Park Jockey Club v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas Park Jockey Club v. Commissioner, 9 B.T.A. 496, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2563 (bta 1927).

Opinion

[498]*498OPINION.

Littleton :

The testimony of a number of witnesses has been submitted relative to the character, cost, and March 1, 1913, value of petitioner’s property, conveyed March 5, 1919, for a total consideration of $300,000, the sum of $285,000 being the net consideration received after the allowance of $15,000 as a commission on the sale to the Kentucky Jockey Club.

The evidence is sufficient to convince the Board that the cost of petitioner’s property was as follows:

Cost of land_$130, 000.00
Construction prior to lease_ 150, 000. 00
Construction in 1912, after lease_ 30, 000. 00
Miscellaneous and pari-mutuels, 1912_ 8, 000. 00
Additions from 1913 to 1919_ 21, 366.64
Total_ 339, 366. 64

The evidence also convinces us that the fair market value of petitioner’s property on March 1, 1913, was $350,000 and that $7,500 per annum is a proper and reasonable allowance for exhaustion, wear, and tear of depreciable assets.

[499]*499The March 1, 1913, value therefore depreciated to March, 1919, is $305,000. Petitioner realized from the sale $285,000, which is less than the fair market value of petitioner’s property on March 1, 1913, but more than the cost value depreciated at the same ratio from date of acquisition to date of sale, and therefore petitioner neither realized a taxable gain nor sustained a deductible loss on the sale in 1919.

The evidence does not establish that the petitioner was guilty of negligence such as would warrant the imposition of the penalty of 5 per cent affirmatively claimed by the Commissioner in his answer and at the hearing.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rude 50.

Considered by Smith, Tkussell, and Lov®.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglas Park Jockey Club v. Commissioner
9 B.T.A. 496 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 B.T.A. 496, 1927 BTA LEXIS 2563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-park-jockey-club-v-commissioner-bta-1927.