Douglas Coder & Linda Coder Family LLLP v. RNO Exhibitions, LLC

Opinion

1 Janine C. Prupas, Bar No. 9156 Wayne Klomp, Bar No. 10109 2 ISNELL & WILMER Lx. 3 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501 4 Telephone: 775-785-5440 Facsimile: 775-785-5441 5 /Email: jprupas@swlaw.com 6 wklomp @swlaw.com 7 Stephen J. Joncus, Admitted Pro Hac Vice JONCUS LAW P.c. 8 13203 SE 172™ Ave. Ste 166 #344 Happy Valley, Oregon 97086 9 Telephone: 971-236-1200 10 Facsimile: 971-244-7997 Email: steve @joncus.net 11 Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Party 12. Plaintiffs RNO Exhibitions LLC and Vincent Webb DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 DOUGLAS CODER & LINDA CODER 16 FAMILY LLLP, Case No. 3:19-cv-00520-MMD-CLB 17 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND 18 lV- TO MOTION TO STRIKE, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO 19 RNO EXHIBITIONS, LLC, a Nevada limited DISMISS RNO EXHIBITIONS LLC’S liability company; and VINCENT WEBB, an THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT 209 individual, AGAINST SCOTT CODER AND CODER CONSULTING TEAM Defendants. (First Request) 22 23 RNO EXHIBITIONS LLC, 24 Third-Party Plaintiff, 25 V. 26 SCOTT CODER, and CODER CONSULTING TEAM, LLC, 27 . Third-Party Defendants. 28

1 Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and II 7-1, Plaintiff Douglas Coder & Linda Coder Family 2 LLLP; Defendants RNO Exhibitions, LLC (‘RNO”) and Vincent Webb (together with RNO 3 “Defendants”); and Third-Party Defendants Scott Coder and Coder Consulting Team, LLC 4 (Coder Consulting’) (collectively, Plaintiff, Defendants, and Third-Party Defendants are the 5 “Parties’), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, submit this Stipulation 6 and Proposed Order extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Third-Party Defendants 7 Motion to Strike, or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss RNO Exhibitions LLC’s Third-Party 8 Complaint (“Motion to Strike’) filed on December 8, 2020 (ECF No. 70). Defendants’ response 9 is currently due December 22, 2020. 10 The Parties agree that Defendants shall have until January 5, 2021, by which to respond 11 to the Motion to Strike. This is the Parties’ first request for an extension of time to respond to the 12 Motion to Strike, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. Rather the | 13 || extension was requested and granted in good faith due to prior commitments of the Defendants

| 14 || and their attorneys. | 15 | w 16 WW 17 /// 18 }} /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// _2-

1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties that the time 2 for Defendants to respond to the Motion to Strike in this action is extended to and through 3 January 5, 2021. 4 5 Dated: December 21, 2020 Dated: December 21, 2020 6 KAEMPFER CROWELL SNELL & WILMER L.L.p. 7 By: __ /s/ Sihomara Graves By: _ /s/ Wayne Klomp 8 Alex Flangas, No. 664 Janine C. Prupas, No. 9156 Sihomara Graves, No. 13239 Wayne Klomp, No. 10109 9 50 W Liberty St., Suite 700 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 10 Reno, NV 89501 Reno, Nevada 89501 11 ) Attorneys for Plaintiff and Third-Party Stephen J. Joncus (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Defendants JONCUS LAW P.C. 12 13203 SE 172" Ave Ste 166 #344 = B Happy Valley, Oregon 97086 Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Party 14 Plaintiff 15 | 17 19 IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 UNITED STATES JUDGE DATED: December 21, 2020 _ 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-