Douglas Coder & Linda Coder Family LLLP v. RNO Exhibitions, LLC

Opinion

1 Janine C. Prupas, Bar No. 9156 Wayne Klomp, Bar No. 10109 2 |ISNELL & WILMER Lx. 3 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501 4 ||Telephone: 775-785-5440 Facsimile: 775-785-5441 5 |/Email: jprupas@swlaw.com 6 wklomp @swlaw.com 7 Stephen J. Joncus, Admitted Pro Hac Vice JONCUS LAW P.c. 8 || 13203 SE 172™ Ave. Ste 166 #344 Happy Valley, Oregon 97086 9 | Telephone: 971-236-1200 10 Facsimile: 971-244-7997 Email: steve @joncus.net 11 Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Party 12. || Plaintiffs RNO Exhibitions LLC and Vincent Webb 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 DOUGLAS CODER & LINDA CODER 16 FAMILY LLLP, Case No. 3:19-cv-00520-MMD-CLB 17 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND 18 |lV- TO MOTION TO STRIKE, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO 19 || RNO EXHIBITIONS, LLC, a Nevada limited DISMISS RNO EXHIBITIONS LLC’S liability company; and VINCENT WEBB, an THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT 209 ||individual, AGAINST SCOTT CODER AND CODER CONSULTING TEAM Defendants. (First Request) 22 23 || RNO EXHIBITIONS LLC, 24 Third-Party Plaintiff, 25 V. 26 || SCOTT CODER, and CODER CONSULTING TEAM, LLC, 27 . Third-Party Defendants. 28

1 Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and II 7-1, Plaintiff Douglas Coder & Linda Coder Family 2 || LLLP; Defendants RNO Exhibitions, LLC (‘RNO”) and Vincent Webb (together with RNO 3 || “Defendants”); and Third-Party Defendants Scott Coder and Coder Consulting Team, LLC 4 || (Coder Consulting’) (collectively, Plaintiff, Defendants, and Third-Party Defendants are the 5 || “Parties’), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, submit this Stipulation 6 || and Proposed Order extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Third-Party Defendants 7 || Motion to Strike, or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss RNO Exhibitions LLC’s Third-Party 8 || Complaint (“Motion to Strike’) filed on December 8, 2020 (ECF No. 70). Defendants’ response 9 || is currently due December 22, 2020. 10 The Parties agree that Defendants shall have until January 5, 2021, by which to respond 11 || to the Motion to Strike. This is the Parties’ first request for an extension of time to respond to the 12 || Motion to Strike, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. Rather the | 13 || extension was requested and granted in good faith due to prior commitments of the Defendants

| 14 || and their attorneys. | 15 | w | 16 WW 17 || /// 18 }} /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 | /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 | /// 28 /// _2-

1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties that the time 2 || for Defendants to respond to the Motion to Strike in this action is extended to and through 3 || January 5, 2021. 4 5 Dated: December 21, 2020 Dated: December 21, 2020 6 KAEMPFER CROWELL SNELL & WILMER L.L.p. 7 By: __ /s/ Sihomara Graves By: _ /s/ Wayne Klomp 8 Alex Flangas, No. 664 Janine C. Prupas, No. 9156 Sihomara Graves, No. 13239 Wayne Klomp, No. 10109 9 50 W Liberty St., Suite 700 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 10 Reno, NV 89501 Reno, Nevada 89501 11 |) Attorneys for Plaintiff and Third-Party Stephen J. Joncus (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Defendants JONCUS LAW P.C. 12 13203 SE 172" Ave Ste 166 #344 = B Happy Valley, Oregon 97086 Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Party 14 Plaintiff 15 | 17 18 ORDER 19 IT IS SO ORDERED: 20 UNITED STATES JUDGE DATED: December 21, 2020 _ 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-