Douglas Coder & Linda Coder Family LLLP v. RNO Exhibitions, LLC
Opinion
1 Janine C. Prupas, Bar No. 9156 Kiah D. Beverly-Graham, Bar No. 11916 2 SNELL & WILMER Lv. 3 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, Nevada 89501 4 Telephone: 775-785-5440 Facsimile: 775-785-5441 5 Email: jprupas@swlaw.com 6 kbeverly @ swlaw.com 7 Stephen J. Joncus, Admitted Pro Hac Vice JONCUS LAW P.c. 8 13203 SE 172™ Ave. Ste 166 #344 Happy Valley, Oregon 97086 9 Telephone: 971-236-1200 10 Facsimile: 971-244-7997 Email: steve @joncus.net 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 RNO Exhibitions LLC and Vincent Webb = 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Bare 15 DOUGLAS CODER & LINDA CODER 3° 16 || FAMILY LLLP, Case No. 3:19-cv-00520-MMD-CLB 17 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND 18 Vv: TO COMPLAINT TO OCTOBER 390, 2020 19 } RNO EXHIBITIONS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; and VINCENT WEBB, an (FIRST REQUEST) 20 individual, 2] Defendants. 22 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1, Plaintiffs Douglas Coder & Linda Coder Family LLLP 24 (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants RNO Exhibitions, LLC and Vincent Webb (“Defendants”, and 25 together with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of 26 record, submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order. 27 Plaintiff filed and served an Amended Complaint on April 20, 2020 (ECF No. 37) (the 28 “FAC’);
1 Defendants timely filed Motions to Dismiss the FAC on May 20, 2020 (ECF Nos. 42 and 2 43); 3 On October 9, 2020, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part the 4 Motions to Dismiss (ECF No. 56); 5 Defendants’ deadline to respond to the FAC’s surviving allegations is October 23, 2020; 6 and 7 This is the Parties’ first request for an extension of time to respond to the FAC and is not 8 intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. The reason for the extension is to give 9 Defendants time to evaluate and respond to the allegations set forth in the FAC. 10 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties that the time 11 for Defendants to respond to the FAC in this action is extended to and through October 30, 2020. 12 Dated: October 21, 2020 Dated: October 21, 2020 13 KAEMPFER CROWELL SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
By: /s/Alex J. Flangas (with permission) 1S Alex J. Flangas, Esq. NV Bar 664 By: Kiah D. Beverly-Graham 6 50 W Liberty St., Suite 700 Janine C. Prupas, No. 9156 2 Reno, NV 89501 Kiah D. Beverly-Graham, No. 11916 17 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Douglas Coder & Reno, Nevada 89501 18 Linda Coder Family LLLP Stephen J. Joncus 19 Admitted Pro Hac Vice JONCUS LAW P.C. 13203 SE 172"! Ave Ste 166 #344 21 Happy Valley, Oregon 97086 Attorneys for Defendants 22 RNO Exhibitions LLC and Vincent Webb 23 ORDER 25 IT IS SO RED:
26 27 UNITED STAT AGISTRATE JUDGE 28 DATED: October 21, 2020 _2-
2 I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically filed the STIPULATION AND ORDER 3 TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO OCTOBER 30, 2020 4 (FIRST REQUEST) with the Clerk of the Court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada 5 by using the Court’s CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECEF users 6 will be served by the CM/ECF system. 7 DATED: October 21, 2020 8 By /s/ Lara J. Taylor 9 An employee of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 10 11 12 13
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Douglas Coder & Linda Coder Family LLLP v. RNO Exhibitions, LLC (Douglas Coder & Linda Coder Family LLLP v. RNO Exhibitions, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.