Doucet v. Landry

137 So. 2d 431, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1557
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 7, 1962
DocketNo. 518
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 137 So. 2d 431 (Doucet v. Landry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doucet v. Landry, 137 So. 2d 431, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1557 (La. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

SAVOY, Judge.

Plaintiffs have appealed to this Court from a judgment of the district court maintaining an exception of no cause of action and exception of no right of action filed by defendants rejecting their demands and dismissing their suit.

The record in the instant case does not contain the judgment of the district court, and according to the Minutes found in the record, the district judge never did sign a final judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ suit.

Article 543 of the Louisiana Code of Practice which governed at that time, provides in part that all judgments must be read, rendered and signed by the judge in open court. According to the Minutes found in the record in the instant case, the judgment was rendered on October 5, 1961, but there is no Minute Entry to the effect that a decree was read and signed. Even under the provisions of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure, which became effective January 1, 1962, Article 1911 of said LSA-Code of Civil Procedure provides except as otherwise .provided by law, all final judgments shall be read and signed by the judg'e in open court.

In the case of Frazier v. Muse, (Ct.App., 1 Cir., 1956), 88 So.2d 729, the Court said:

“It is now the well-settled jurisprudence of this State, that no appeal lies from a judgment before it is signed; in such a case the judgment is inchoate, and the appeal premature * * (Citations omitted.)

An appeal taken before signing of a judgment is premature and must be dismissed ex proprio motu. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Callicott, (Ct.App., 1 Cir., 1955), 83 So.2d 671.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal herein is dismissed without prejudice at the costs of plaintiffs-appellants.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sisco v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
164 So. 2d 383 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Fontenot v. Lee
160 So. 2d 26 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Doucet v. Landry
140 So. 2d 690 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 So. 2d 431, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doucet-v-landry-lactapp-1962.