Dortch v. State
This text of 588 So. 2d 342 (Dortch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vincent DORTCH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Vincent Dortch, pro se.
Bruce H. Colton, State Atty. and E. Louis Stern, Asst. State Atty., Stuart, for appellee.
*343 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
We grant appellant's motion for rehearing and substitute the following for our opinion of September 4, 1991:
We reverse the trial court's summary denial of appellant's motion for post conviction relief. We also remand for the trial court to determine whether appellant requested his attorney to file an appeal. The trial court may conduct an evidentiary hearing to resolve that issue or attach that portion of the record which negates appellant's sworn response that he requested an appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION.
ANSTEAD, GARRETT and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
588 So. 2d 342, 1991 WL 235257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dortch-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.