Dorrell v. Herr
111 N.E. 614, 184 Ind. 445, 1916 Ind. LEXIS 138
Opinion
The only error assigned in this case which is stated as being relied on by appellants in their brief, is the action of the trial court in overruling their motion for a new trial. The only statutory grounds alleged in this motion relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the court. As there was some evidence to sustain these findings on every material issue the position of appellants is not well taken. Judgment affirmed.
Note. — Reported in 111 N. E. 614. See, also 4 C. J. 877; 3 Cyc 360.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dorrell v. Herr, 111 N.E. 614, 184 Ind. 445, 1916 Ind. LEXIS 138 (Ind. 1916).
111 N.E. 614 (Dorrell v. Herr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strauss v. Conner
85 Ind. App. 701 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1926)
Union Traction Co. v. City of Muncie
133 N.E. 160 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1921)
Roper v. Cannel City Oil Co.
121 N.E. 96 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1918)
Daub v. Van Lundy
118 N.E. 140 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)
Drake v. Drake
117 N.E. 871 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)
Adam v. Board of Commissioners
117 N.E. 876 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)
Workman v. Rhodes
117 N.E. 526 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)
Cline v. Indianapolis Mortar & Fuel Co.
117 N.E. 509 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)
Repp v. Indianapolis, Columbus & Southern Traction Co.
111 N.E. 614 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1916)