Dorrell v. Herr

Indiana Supreme Court

Dorrell v. Herr

111 N.E. 614, 184 Ind. 445, 1916 Ind. LEXIS 138

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 23, 1916

DocketNo. 22,883

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 111 N.E. 614 (Dorrell v. Herr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorrell v. Herr, 111 N.E. 614, 184 Ind. 445, 1916 Ind. LEXIS 138 (Ind. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Lairy, J.

The only error assigned in this case which is stated as being relied on by appellants in their brief, is the action of the trial court in overruling their motion for a new trial. The only statutory grounds alleged in this motion relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the court. As there was some evidence to sustain these findings on every material issue the position of appellants is not well taken. Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 111 N. E. 614. See, also 4 C. J. 877; 3 Cyc 360.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lairy, J.

The only error assigned in this case which is stated as being relied on by appellants in their brief, is the action of the trial court in overruling their motion for a new trial. The only statutory grounds alleged in this motion relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the court. As there was some evidence to sustain these findings on every material issue the position of appellants is not well taken. Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 111 N. E. 614. See, also 4 C. J. 877; 3 Cyc 360.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 N.E. 614, 184 Ind. 445, 1916 Ind. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorrell-v-herr-ind-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack