Dornbusch v. Dornbusch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dornbusch v. Dornbusch

87 A.D.2d 883, 449 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16383

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 883 (Dornbusch v. Dornbusch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dornbusch v. Dornbusch, 87 A.D.2d 883, 449 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16383 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action (Action No. 2), the plaintiff husband appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered May 13,1981, as dismissed his complaint for failure to establish his causes of action for divorce by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The departure of Mrs. Dornbusch from the marital bedroom and her abstention from sexual relations were based on a reasonable claim of mistreatment by her husband. Consequently, her actions did not constitute an abandonment (see Phillips v Phillips, 70 AD2d 30; Fischel v Fischel, 286 App Div 842). Furthermore, once the separation action was commenced by the wife (Action No. 1), she was under no obligation to follow her husband to France (see Mirizio v Mirizio, 248 NY 175, 180-181; see, also, Phillips v Phillips, supra). The husband’s other contentions are also without merit. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action (Action No. 2), the plaintiff husband appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered May 13,1981, as dismissed his complaint for failure to establish his causes of action for divorce by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The departure of Mrs. Dornbusch from the marital bedroom and her abstention from sexual relations were based on a reasonable claim of mistreatment by her husband. Consequently, her actions did not constitute an abandonment (see Phillips v Phillips, 70 AD2d 30; Fischel v Fischel, 286 App Div 842). Furthermore, once the separation action was commenced by the wife (Action No. 1), she was under no obligation to follow her husband to France (see Mirizio v Mirizio, 248 NY 175, 180-181; see, also, Phillips v Phillips, supra). The husband’s other contentions are also without merit. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 883, 449 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dornbusch-v-dornbusch-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack