Dorn v. Dorn
This text of 434 So. 2d 348 (Dorn v. Dorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After examining the testimony before the general master the trial court, basing its decision, in part on the general master’s findings of fact, granted some of the wife’s exceptions. Our examination of the briefs, record and findings of the general master and trial court reveals no real issue concerning the facts. The trial court merely concluded from those facts that the amount of alimony should be increased. This modification was wholly consistent with the general master’s findings of fact and was within the trial court’s discretion. Ciccarelli v. Ciccarelli, 352 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Vogel v. Vogel, 323 So.2d 306 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 So. 2d 348, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorn-v-dorn-fladistctapp-1983.