Catinella v. Catinella

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Catinella v. Catinella

497 So. 2d 681, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2275, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10284

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 28, 1986

DocketNo. 86-513

StatusPublished

This text of 497 So. 2d 681 (Catinella v. Catinella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Catinella v. Catinella, 497 So. 2d 681, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2275, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10284 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Following this court’s opinion and decision reported in Catinella v. Catinella, 471 So.2d 1362 (Fla.3d DCA 1985) the matter recurred in the trial court. Upon appropriate motions, duly noticed, the trial judge reviewed the evidence and the record as it existed before the General Master and rendered a judgment for the plaintiff on support arrearages and reduced the father’s obligations of support. We find no error and affirm the modifications of the General Master’s report, each of the modifications being consistent with the responsibilities of the parties under the facts as found by the Master. Dorn v. Dorn, 434 So.2d 348 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Ciccarelli v. Ciccarelli, 352 So.2d 1204 (Fla.4th DCA 1978); Vo-gel v. Vogel, 323 So.2d 306 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Following this court’s opinion and decision reported in Catinella v. Catinella, 471 So.2d 1362 (Fla.3d DCA 1985) the matter recurred in the trial court. Upon appropriate motions, duly noticed, the trial judge reviewed the evidence and the record as it existed before the General Master and rendered a judgment for the plaintiff on support arrearages and reduced the father’s obligations of support. We find no error and affirm the modifications of the General Master’s report, each of the modifications being consistent with the responsibilities of the parties under the facts as found by the Master. Dorn v. Dorn, 434 So.2d 348 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Ciccarelli v. Ciccarelli, 352 So.2d 1204 (Fla.4th DCA 1978); Vo-gel v. Vogel, 323 So.2d 306 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 So. 2d 681, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2275, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catinella-v-catinella-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack