Doris Harwood v. Maurice J. Tobin

Sixth Circuit

Doris Harwood v. Maurice J. Tobin

194 F.2d 538, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2802

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 19, 1952·No. 11419_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*539 PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard by the court on the transcript of record, briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties;

And the court being of the opinion that the Findings of Fact of the District Judge are not clearly erroneous, and that there was no error in the Conclusions of Law applicable thereto, Walling v. American Needlecrafts, 6 Cir., 139 F.2d 60; Rutherford Corp. v. McComb, 331 U.S. 722, 67 S.Ct. 1473, 91 L.Ed. 1772;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*539 PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard by the court on the transcript of record, briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties;

And the court being of the opinion that the Findings of Fact of the District Judge are not clearly erroneous, and that there was no error in the Conclusions of Law applicable thereto, Walling v. American Needlecrafts, 6 Cir., 139 F.2d 60; Rutherford Corp. v. McComb, 331 U.S. 722, 67 S.Ct. 1473, 91 L.Ed. 1772;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Doris Harwood v. Maurice J. Tobin, 194 F.2d 538, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2802 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

194 F.2d 538 (Doris Harwood v. Maurice J. Tobin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related