Dorey v. Siems

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dorey v. Siems

314 S.W.3d 391, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 865, 2010 WL 2502700

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 22, 2010

DocketED 93888

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 314 S.W.3d 391 (Dorey v. Siems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dorey v. Siems, 314 S.W.3d 391, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 865, 2010 WL 2502700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Dorey (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in his dispute with Randy Siems (“Respondent”). In his sole point on appeal, Appellant claims that the trial court erred in granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles *392 of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI