Borja v. State

314 S.W.3d 391, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 866, 2010 WL 2502699
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 22, 2010·No. ED 94072·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jose Borja appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borja v. State, 314 S.W.3d 391, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 866, 2010 WL 2502699 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

314 S.W.3d 391 (Borja v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorey v. Siems
314 S.W.3d 391 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)