Borja v. State
314 S.W.3d 391, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 866, 2010 WL 2502699
Opinion
ORDER
Jose Borja appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borja v. State, 314 S.W.3d 391, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 866, 2010 WL 2502699 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
314 S.W.3d 391 (Borja v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dorey v. Siems
314 S.W.3d 391 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)