Doonan v. Killilea
155 N.Y.S. 1103
Opinion
The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment (87 Misc. Rep. 427, 149 N. Y. Supp. 832) affirmed, with costs, on authority of De Peyster v. Murphy, 66 N. Y. 622. We do not understand that tins case has been expressly overruled or limited by Real Estate Corporation v. Harper, 174 N. Y. 123, 66 N. E. 660. See, also, 166 App. Div. 937, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1113.
THOMAS, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doonan v. Killilea, 155 N.Y.S. 1103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
155 N.Y.S. 1103 (Doonan v. Killilea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Real Estate Corporation v. . Harper
66 N.E. 660 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
De Peyster v. . Murphy
66 N.Y. 622 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)
Doonan v. Killilea
87 Misc. 427 (New York Supreme Court, 1914)