Doonan v. Killilea
170 A.D. 954
Opinion
The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of De Peyster v. Murphy (66 N. Y. 622). We do not understand that this case has been expressly overruled or limited by Real Estate Corporation v. Harper (174 N. Y. 123). Jenks, P. J., Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doonan v. Killilea, 170 A.D. 954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
170 A.D. 954 (Doonan v. Killilea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Real Estate Corporation v. . Harper
66 N.E. 660 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
De Peyster v. . Murphy
66 N.Y. 622 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)