Doody v. Schriro
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHNATHAN ANDREW DOODY, Petitioner-Appellant,
No. 06-17161
v.
DORA B. SCHRIRO; MEGAN SAVAGE; D.C. No.
CV-98-00528-EHC
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ORDER
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondents-Appellees.
Filed May 12, 2009
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Hawkins and Silverman did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doody v. Schriro (Doody v. Schriro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.