Doody v. Schriro

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doody v. Schriro. Read the opinion of the Court — 548 F.3d 847
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 12, 2009·No. 06-17161·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNATHAN ANDREW DOODY,  Petitioner-Appellant,

No. 06-17161

v.

DORA B. SCHRIRO; MEGAN SAVAGE;  D.C. No.

CV-98-00528-EHC

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ORDER

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondents-Appellees.

Filed May 12, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Hawkins and Silverman did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doody v. Schriro, (9th Cir. 2009).

Doody v. Schriro (Doody v. Schriro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doody v. Ryan
649 F.3d 986 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)