Doody v. Schriro
This text of Doody v. Schriro (Doody v. Schriro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHNATHAN ANDREW DOODY, Petitioner-Appellant, No. 06-17161 v. DORA B. SCHRIRO; MEGAN SAVAGE; D.C. No. CV-98-00528-EHC ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ORDER STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondents-Appellees. Filed May 12, 2009
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Hawkins and Silverman did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
5901 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Doody v. Schriro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doody-v-schriro-ca9-2009.