Donohue v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Donohue v. State

217 P. 1117, 24 Okla. Crim. 287

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 31, 1923·No. No. A-4143.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BESSEY, J.

On October 4, 1921, plaintiff in error, Allan Donohue, was convicted of unlawfully selling whisky. His punishment was by verdict of a jury fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a term of 30 days. An examination of the briefs and record discloses that the information was sufficient; that there was no variance between the allegations and the proof; that there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict; and that plaintiff in error was in other respects accorded a fair trial, as contemplated by law. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

MATSON, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., absent and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BESSEY, J.

On October 4, 1921, plaintiff in error, Allan Donohue, was convicted of unlawfully selling whisky. His punishment was by verdict of a jury fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a term of 30 days. An examination of the briefs and record discloses that the information was sufficient; that there was no variance between the allegations and the proof; that there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict; and that plaintiff in error was in other respects accorded a fair trial, as contemplated by law. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

MATSON, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., absent and not participating.

Donohue v. State, 217 P. 1117, 24 Okla. Crim. 287 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

217 P. 1117 (Donohue v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related