Donnie Benson v. State
This text of Donnie Benson v. State (Donnie Benson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE FILED January 14, 1998 DONNIE EUGENE BENSON, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9708-CR-00324 Cecil W. Crowson Appellant, ) (No. 86-F-1485 Below) Appellate Court Clerk ) DAVIDSON COUNTY VS. ) ) The Hon. J. Randall Wyatt, Jr. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) (Dismissal of Post-Conviction Petition) Appellee. ) ) AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20
ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon the appellant’s pro se Request to
Proceed on the Record Without the Filing of Briefs. The state opposes the motion. The
appellant is appealing from the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief without a
hearing. In finding that the appellant’s petition was barred by the statute of limitation, the
trial court noted that the appellant pled guilty to one count of aggravated rape on April 13,
1987. No appeal was taken. The trial court held that the petitioner’s claims, which did not
fall within any of the statutorily recognized exceptions, were barred by the statute of
limitation.
The Court finds that the appellant’s request is well taken. Accordingly, we
have reviewed the record in the above-styled cause without the benefit of argument, and
we find that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20,
Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules.
On May 13, 1996, the Post-Conviction Procedure Act was amended to reflect
that no court shall have jurisdiction to consider a petition filed after the one-year statute of
limitation unless one of three enumerated exceptions applied. See T.C.A. § 40-30-202(b).
In the present case, the trial court correctly determined that the appellant’s petition for post-
conviction was time-barred. Moreover, the trial court could not have considered the
request for relief as a petition for habeas corpus. The petition in this case was filed in
Davidson County, Tennessee, the county in which the appellant was originally convicted.
His petition shows that he is presently incarcerated in Morgan County, Tennessee. A petition for habeas corpus must be filed in the county which is the most convenient in point
of distance to the applicant unless a sufficient reason be given in the petition for not
applying to such court. T.C.A. § 29-21-105 (1980).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the appellant’s motion to consider the
above-styled appeal on the record is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed
pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules. The appellant being
indigent, costs are taxed to the state.
ENTER, this the ____ day of January, 1998.
_____________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
CONCUR:
_____________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE
_____________________________ DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Donnie Benson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donnie-benson-v-state-tenncrimapp-1998.