Donna June Archer, and James David Archer, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Verna Lee Archer v. Burton Plaza Associates, Let., and American Management Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided March 4, 1996·No. 03A01-9511-CV-00417·Published

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

March 4, 1996

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

DONNA J UNE ARCHER a nd J AM ES ) HAW NS CI RCUI T KI

DAVI D ARCHER, I ndi vi dua l l y a nd ) C. A. NO. 03A01- 9511- CV- 0041 7 a s Ad mi ni s t r a t or s o f t he Es t a t e ) o f VERNA LEE ARCHER, )

)

Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l a nt s )

)

)

)

)

)

vs . ) HON. J OHN K. W LSON

I

) J UDGE

)

)

)

)

)

BURTON PLAZA ASSOCI ATES, LTD. , ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED a n d AMERI CAN M ANAGEM ENT COM PANY, ) I NC. , )

)

De f e nda nt s - Appe l l e e s )

W LLI AM E.

I PHI LLI PS, Phi l l i ps a nd Ha l e , Roge r s vi l l e , f or App e l - l a nt s .

TRACEY SHAW Howe l l a nd Fi s he r , Na s hvi l l e , f or Appe l l e e s .

,

O P I N I O N

M M r a y, J .

c ur

Thi s i s a n a c t i on f or wr ongf ul de a t h. The pl a i nt i f f s s e e k t o r e c o v e r da ma ge s f r om t he owne r s a nd ope r a t or s of t he Bur t on Pl a z a Ap a r t me nt s c ompl e x i n Roge r s vi l l e . The pl a i nt i f f s a s s e r t t ha t t he d e f e n d a nt s we r e ne gl i ge nt i n f a i l i ng t o pr ovi de pr ope r s e c ur i t y a nd p r o t e c t i on f or t he oc c upa n t s of t he a pa r t me nt s . Spe c i f i c a l l y, t h e y as s er t t ha t t he out s i de h a l l wa y door s of t he a pa r t me nt b ui l di ng we r e n e ve r l oc ke d. The pl a i nt i f f s a l s o s ue on t he t he or y of br e a c h of c ont r a c t .

The pl a i nt i f f s ' de c e de nt wa s mur de r e d by a t hi r d pa r t y i ns i de t he l a u n dr y r oom of t he a pa r t me nt bui l di ng i n whi c h t he de c e de n t

l i ve d . The t r i a l c our t di s mi s s e d t he c a s e , wi t h pr e j udi c e , on

1

d e f e n d a nt s ' mot i on f or s umma r y j udgme nt . W a f f i r m t he j udgme n t

e

o f t he t r i a l c our t .

The de f e nda nt s ' mot i o n f or s umma r y j udgme nt wa s ba s e d upon t he g r o u n d s t ha t t h e r e i s no di s put e a s t o a ny ma t e r i a l f a c t , t h e r e - f o r e , t he de f e nda nt s a r e e nt i t l e d t o j udgme nt a s a ma t t e r of l a w. I n s u p p or t of t he i r mot i o n f or s umma r y j udgme nt , t he de f e nda n t s

1

Th e o r d e r d i s mi s s i n g t h e c a s e p r o v i d e s a s f o l l o ws : " I t i s t h e r e f o r e ORDERED AND ADJ UDGED t h a t t h i s a c t i o n i s d i s mi s s e d o n t h e me r i t s wi t h p r e j u d i c e , a n d t h e c o s t s o f t h i s c a u s e s h a l l b e t a x e d t o t h e p l a i n t i f f s , and t he pl ai nt i f f may s ubmi t l a w on t he c ont r ac t ual as pe c t t o s e e i f t he c o u r t ne e ds t o r e v i e w t ha t a r e a , onl y . " Th e e mp h a s i z e d p a r t o f t h e a b o v e o r d e r wa s a h a n d wr i t t e n n o t a t i o n ma d e b y t h e t r i a l c our t . W v i e w t h i s a s a n i n v i t a t i o n f o r t h e p l a i n t i f f s t o f i l e a mo t i o n t o

e

r e c o n s i d e r o r o t h e r s i mi l a r mo t i o n , a l o n g wi t h a b r i e f o f l a w i n t h e e v e n t t h e y c hos e t o do s o. Si n c e t h e r e c o r d i s s i l e n t c o n c e r n i n g a n y f u r t h e r a c t i o n o f t h e p a r t o f t h e p l a i n t i f f s , o t h e r t h a n t h i s a p p e a l , we a r e o f t h e o p i n i o n a n d h o l d t h a t t h e p l a i n t i f f s e l e c t e d n o t t o p u r s u e t h e ma t t e r f u r t h e r i n t h e t r i a l c o u r t , h e n c e , t he above or de r i s f i na l and a ppe a l a bl e as of r i ght .

f i l e d t he a f f i da vi t s of I moge ne Tr e nt , Pa t t y Own b y , La r r y La ws o n

a nd Ro b e r t M Re e ve s , . a s we l l a s t he de pos i t i ons of Donna Ar c h e r

a nd J a me s Da vi d Ar c he r .

The pl a i nt i f f s in o ppos i t i on to t he mot i on f or s umma r y

j u d g me n t r e l y upon t he de pos i t i ons of I moge ne Tr e nt , Ha z e l M ye s ,

a

Do n n a J une Ar c he r a nd J a me s Da vi d Ar c he r .

Th e pl a i nt i f f s pr e s e nt t he f ol l owi ng i s s ue s f or our r e vi e w:

1. Di d t h e t r i a l c o ur t e r r i n de t e r mi ni ng t ha t , a s a ma t t e r of l a w, t he de f e nda nt s we r e e n t i t l e d t o s umma r y j udgme nt a s t o t he ne gl i ge nc e c ount of t he pl a i nt i f f s ' c a us e of a c t i on?

2. Di d t h e t r i a l c o ur t e r r i n de t e r mi ni ng t ha t , a s a ma t t e r of l a w, t h e de f e n da nt s we r e e nt i t l e d t o s umma r y j udgme nt a s t o t he br e a c h of c ont r a c t c ount of t he pl a i nt i f f s ' c a us e of a c t i on?

STANDARD OF REVI EW

Ou r s t a nda r ds of r e vi e w i n c ons i de r i ng t he pr opr i e t y of s u mma r y j udgme nt i s a s f ol l ows :

The s t a nda r ds gove r ni ng a n a ppe l l a t e c our t ' s r e vi e w o f a t r i a l c our t ' s a c t i on on a mot i on f or s umma r y j u dgme nt a r e we l l s e t t l e d. Si nc e our i n qui r y i nvol ve s p u r e l y a que s t i on of l a w, no pr e s umpt i on of c or r e c t ne s s a t t a c he s t o t he t r i a l c our t ' s j udgme nt , a nd our t a s k i s c o nf i ne d t o r e vi e wi ng t he r e c or d t o de t e r mi ne whe t he r t he r e qui r e me nt s of Te nn. R. Ci v. P. 56 ha ve be e n me t . Cowde n

v . Sovr a n Ba nk/ Ce nt r a l Sout h, 816 S. W 2d 741, 744 ( Te nn.

.

1 9 91) . Te nn. R. Ci v. P. 56. 03 pr ovi de s t ha t s umma r y j u dgme nt i s onl y a ppr opr i a t e whe r e : ( 1) t he r e i s no g e nui ne i s s ue wi t h r e ga r d t o t he ma t e r i a l f a c t s r e l e va nt t o t he c l a i m or de f e ns e c ont a i ne d i n t he mot i on, Byr d v.

Ha l l [ v. Ha l l ] , 847 S. W 2d 208, 210 ( Te nn. 1993) ; a nd ( 2)

.

t h e movi ng pa r t y i s e nt i t l e d t o a j udgme nt a s ma t t e r of l a w on t he u ndi s pu t e d f a c t s . Ande r s on v. St a nda r d Re gi s t e r Co. , 857 S. W 2d 555, 559 ( Te nn. 1993) . The .

mo vi ng pa r t y h a s t he bur de n of pr ovi ng t ha t i t s mot i on s a t i s f i e s t he s e r e qu i r e me nt s . Downe n v. Al l s t a t e I ns .

Co. , 811 S. W 2d 523, 524 ( Te nn. 1991) .

.

The s t a nda r ds gove r ni ng t he a s s e s s me nt of e vi de nc e i n t he s umma r y j udgme nt c ont e xt a r e a l s o we l l e s t a b-

l i s he d. Cour t s mus t vi e w t he e vi de nc e i n t he l i ght mos t f a vor a bl e t o t he nonmovi ng pa r t y a nd mus t a l s o dr a w a l l r e a s ona bl e i nf e r e nc e s i n t he nonmovi ng pa r t y' s f a vor .

Byr d, 847 S. W 2d a t 21 0- 11. Cour t s s houl d gr a nt a s umma r y .

j u dgme nt onl y whe n bo t h t he f a c t s a nd t he c onc l us i ons t o b e d r a wn f r om t he f a c t s pe r mi t a r e a s ona b l e pe r s on t o r e a c h onl y one c onc l us i on. I d.

Ca r v e l l v. Bot t oms , 900 S. W 2d 23 ( Te nn. 1995) .

.

DI SCUSSI ON

The Cont r ac t I s s ue

W wi l l f i r s t di s c us s t he c ont r a c t i s s ue .

e The pr ovi s i ons of

t h e c o n t r a c t r e l i e d upon by t he pl a i nt i f f s a r e f ound i n t he l e a s e a gr e e me nt b e t we e n t he de c e de nt a nd t he de f e nda nt s . The s p e c i f i c p r o v i s i ons upon whi c h t he pl a i nt i f f s r e l y a r e f ound i n Se c t i o n e l e ve n of t he l e a s e a gr e e me nt :

Se c t i on 11. M nt e nanc e :

ai

a. The La ndl or d a gr e e s t o:

( 1) r e gul a r l y c l e a n a l l c ommon a r e a s of t h e pr o-

j ect ;

( 2) m nt ai n t he c om on ar e as and f ac i l i t i e s i n a ai m

s af e c ondi t i on; ( Empha s i s a dde d) .

( 3) a r r a nge f or c ol l e c t i on a nd r e mova l of t r as h a nd ga r ba ge ;

( 4) ma i nt a i n a l l e qui pme nt a nd a ppl i a nc e s i n s a f e a nd wor ki ng or de r ;

( 5) ma ke t he ne c e s s a r y r e pa i r s wi t h r e a s ona bl e pr ompt ne s s ;

( 6) ma i nt a i n e xt e r i or l i ght i ng in good wor ki ng or de r ;

( 7) pr ovi de e xt e r mi na t i on s e r vi c e s , a s ne c e s s a r y;

a nd

( 8) ma i nt a i n gr ounds a nd s hr ubs .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donna June Archer, and James David Archer, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Verna Lee Archer v. Burton Plaza Associates, Let., and American Management Company, Inc., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

Donna June Archer, and James David Archer, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Verna Lee Archer v. Burton Plaza Associates, Let., and American Management Company, Inc. (Donna June Archer, and James David Archer, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Verna Lee Archer v. Burton Plaza Associates, Let., and American Management Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bob Pearsall Motors, Inc. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
521 S.W.2d 578 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1975)
Cornpropst v. Sloan
528 S.W.2d 188 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1975)
Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central South
816 S.W.2d 741 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1991)
Downen v. Allstate Insurance Co.
811 S.W.2d 523 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1991)
Anderson v. Standard Register Co.
857 S.W.2d 555 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1993)
APAC-Tennessee, Inc. v. J.M. Humphries Construction Co.
732 S.W.2d 601 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1986)
Carvell v. Bottoms
900 S.W.2d 23 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1995)
Byrd v. Hall
847 S.W.2d 208 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1993)
Brodie v. Miller
143 S.W.2d 1042 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1940)
Southeastern Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Groves
136 S.W.2d 512 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1940)
Duncan v. State
7 S.W.2d 79 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Houston Chronicle Pub. Co. v. Martin
5 S.W.2d 170 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Quality Care Nursing Services, Inc. v. Coleman
728 S.W.2d 1 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1987)