Donald v. Swann

137 So. 181, 223 Ala. 493, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 497
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 22, 1931
Docket6 Div. 999.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 137 So. 181 (Donald v. Swann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald v. Swann, 137 So. 181, 223 Ala. 493, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 497 (Ala. 1931).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Ruthie Catherine Swann for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that, court in D. C. Donald v. Ruthie Catherine Swann, 137 So. 178.

The majority of the justices, consisting of ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, THOMAS, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., are of the-opinion that the writ of certiorari should be denied, and it is so ordered.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, THOMAS, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur. SAYRE, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fain v. Smith
479 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Samuel Jones, Jr. v. Preuit & Mauldin
763 F.2d 1250 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Dunkin v. Druid City Hospital Regional Medical Center
462 So. 2d 732 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1984)
Brown v. Wood
202 So. 2d 125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Chambers v. Nottebaum
96 So. 2d 716 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 So. 181, 223 Ala. 493, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-v-swann-ala-1931.