Donald v. Swann
137 So. 181, 223 Ala. 493, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 497
Opinions
Petition of Ruthie Catherine Swann for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that, court in D. C. Donald v. Ruthie Catherine Swann, 137 So. 178.
The majority of the justices, consisting of ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, THOMAS, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., are of the-opinion that the writ of certiorari should be denied, and it is so ordered.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donald v. Swann, 137 So. 181, 223 Ala. 493, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 497 (Ala. 1931).
137 So. 181 (Donald v. Swann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fain v. Smith
479 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Samuel Jones, Jr. v. Preuit & Mauldin
763 F.2d 1250 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Dunkin v. Druid City Hospital Regional Medical Center
462 So. 2d 732 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1984)
Brown v. Wood
202 So. 2d 125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Chambers v. Nottebaum
96 So. 2d 716 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)