Donald v. Swann
This text of 137 So. 181 (Donald v. Swann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Petition of Ruthie Catherine Swann for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that, court in D. C. Donald v. Ruthie Catherine Swann, 137 So. 178.
The majority of the justices, consisting of ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, THOMAS, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., are of the-opinion that the writ of certiorari should be denied, and it is so ordered.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 So. 181, 223 Ala. 493, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-v-swann-ala-1931.