Donald v. State

158 A.D.2d 366
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1990·No. Claim No. 71189·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In this action where the claimant suffered serious eye injury in a second altercation with a fellow patient, the court failed to find any lack of staff supervision or State negligence contributing to the injury. From the evidence presented at trial, it was established that the injuries were the result of a sudden incident, which closer supervision might not have prevented. (Carlino v State of New York, 30 AD2d 987 [3d Dept 1968].) Considering the nature of the program involved and its rehabilitative purpose, no liability or negligence should attach to the State under these circumstances. (Seavy v State of New York, 21 AD2d 445 [4th Dept 1964], affd 17 NY2d 675 [1966].) Concur—Ross, J. P., Milonas, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald v. State, 158 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 366 (Donald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanchez v. State
288 A.D.2d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)