Donald v. State

20 S.W.3d 331, 341 Ark. 803, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 340
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 29, 2000
DocketCR 00-677
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 20 S.W.3d 331 (Donald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald v. State, 20 S.W.3d 331, 341 Ark. 803, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 340 (Ark. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Gregory Donald has filed a motion RIAM. appeal. The record reflects that the judgment and commitment order was filed on November 9, 1999, but that the notice of appeal was not filed until January 18, 2000. Appellant’s counsel, Charles S. Gibson, has filed an affidavit pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. — Crim. 2(e) admitting responsibility for the failure to timely file the notice of appeal.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Pack v. State, 336 Ark. 268, 983 S.W.2d 126 (1999) (per curiam); Brewer v. State, 334 Ark. 234, 973 S.W.2d 482 (1998) (per curiam); Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978). A copy of this per curiam opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. State
114 S.W.3d 204 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2003)
Ervin v. State
102 S.W.3d 501 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2003)
Ross v. State
53 S.W.3d 519 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2001)
Marshall v. State
27 S.W.3d 392 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.W.3d 331, 341 Ark. 803, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-v-state-ark-2000.