Brewer v. State

973 S.W.2d 482, 334 Ark. 234, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 479
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 10, 1998
DocketCR 98-935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 973 S.W.2d 482 (Brewer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brewer v. State, 973 S.W.2d 482, 334 Ark. 234, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 479 (Ark. 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Cephus Brewer, by his attorney, Theresa Nazario, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the notice of appeal was not filed in a timely manner due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion, which we will treat as a motion for belated appeal. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for belated appeal is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donald v. State
20 S.W.3d 331 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Johnson v. State
998 S.W.2d 420 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
973 S.W.2d 482, 334 Ark. 234, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-state-ark-1998.