Donald Seeberger v. BNSF Railway Company
This text of Donald Seeberger v. BNSF Railway Company (Donald Seeberger v. BNSF Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Donald Seeberger v. BNSF Railway Company
Appellate case number: 01-12-00583-CV
Trial court case number: 0967871
Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County
Appellant has filed an unopposed “Motion to Correct Clerk’s Record,” asking the Court to direct the district clerk to supplement the clerk’s record with the “Proposed Final Judgment.” The motion is granted.
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the “Proposed Final Judgment” (Image No. 51479890). See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1).
The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in this Court within 10 days of the date of this order.
The cost of preparing this record will be assessed as part of the costs of this appeal upon issuance of this Court’s judgment.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: February 22, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Donald Seeberger v. BNSF Railway Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-seeberger-v-bnsf-railway-company-texapp-2013.