Donald Ray King v. State
This text of Donald Ray King v. State (Donald Ray King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 2, 2018
NO. 03-17-00276-CR
Donald Ray King, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.
Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that King was convicted of the
offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. The judgment, as
modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of
costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Donald Ray King v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-ray-king-v-state-texapp-2018.