Donald Lee Fox v. L. B. Sullivan, Commissioner, Board of Corrections

558 F.2d 235, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11851
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 24, 1977
Docket77-1694
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 558 F.2d 235 (Donald Lee Fox v. L. B. Sullivan, Commissioner, Board of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald Lee Fox v. L. B. Sullivan, Commissioner, Board of Corrections, 558 F.2d 235, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11851 (5th Cir. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

An Alabama prison guard opened a cell door to allow the occupant to place a radio outside for the enjoyment of other prisoners. The occupant thereupon stabbed Donald Lee Fox, a fellow convict, working out *236 side the cell. Fox went to the hospital and was reported dead. Some of his personal property was distributed to other inmates. Fox lived, however, and brought this 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 suit against the Alabama prison authorities to recover for his personal injuries and lost property. A prior panel of this Court held he was entitled to trial on the merits of his allegation that official negligence was responsible for the harm he suffered. Fox v. Sullivan, 539 F.2d 1065 (5th Cir. 1976).

On remand, the district court found the officers involved were not negligent. The court found the jail’s procedures for inmate protection were reasonable, and that the officer opening the door had no basis for anticipating the attack. The court said that although some of Fox’ books arid magazines were given to a fellow inmate, some were later returned. The officers acted under the belief Fox was dead. Testimony also established that the officers thought some of the disputed property did not belong to Fox. His other personal effects were properly preserved. The failure to-return a small portion was not the result of intent or negligence.

The only question for our review is whether the district court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous. Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). We conclude they are not. The district court properly applied the law under which the case was previously remanded to it.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 F.2d 235, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-lee-fox-v-l-b-sullivan-commissioner-board-of-corrections-ca5-1977.