Donald J. Curry v. Pack Unit Administration

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Texas
DecidedSeptember 25, 2025
Docket4:25-cv-04991
StatusUnknown

This text of Donald J. Curry v. Pack Unit Administration (Donald J. Curry v. Pack Unit Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald J. Curry v. Pack Unit Administration, (S.D. Tex. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION DONALD J. CURRY §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:25-cv-261 PACK UNIT ADMINISTRATION § MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE Plaintiff Donald J. Curry, an inmate confined at the Pack Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Pack Unit Administration. The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case. Factual Background Plaintiff complains that the Defendant is using an old policy in order to harass and sexually discriminate against prisoners concerning the “length of religious hair.” (Doc. #1.) Analysis The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28

U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bales, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973). When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. Here, Plaintiff complains of incidents which occurred at the Pack Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice located in Navasota, Grimes County, Texas. When public officials are parties to an action in their official capacities, they reside for venue purposes in the county where they perform their official duties, which in this case is Grimes County. Holloway v. Gunnell, 685 F.2d 150 (Sth Cir. 1982); Lowrey v. Estelle, 433 F.2d 265 (Sth Cir. 1976). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Grimes County is located in the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Accordingly, venue for such claims is not proper in the Eastern District of Texas. When venue is not proper, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). This action should be transferred to the Southern District of Texas. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

SIGNED this the 25th day of September, 2025. CSE Christine Stetson UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winston Holloway v. Robert Gunnell, Warden, Fci
685 F.2d 150 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Jones v. Bales
58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Georgia, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Donald J. Curry v. Pack Unit Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-j-curry-v-pack-unit-administration-txsd-2025.