Donald H. Sharpe v. United States

269 F.2d 63, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3619
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 1959
Docket7861_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 F.2d 63 (Donald H. Sharpe v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald H. Sharpe v. United States, 269 F.2d 63, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3619 (4th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Donald H. Sharpe filed a petition under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, to vacate a sentence imposed upon him for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 10, 2311-2313. From the Court’s action in dismissing the petition this appeal was taken.

Sharpe alleged that his Court-appointed counsel was incompetent, that his plea was induced by a promise of a suspended sentence, that his conduct did not constitute a violation of the Dyer Act, and that he tendered his plea without full understanding of its nature and effect. On procedural grounds he further complains *64 that the Court failed to comply with Rule 11 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., by not inquiring adequately to ascertain whether the plea was made voluntarily and with understanding.

The petitioner further complains that he was not accorded a hearing on his petition.

An examination of the record disclosed mo basis for any of the complaints.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Martin Joseph McNicholas
298 F.2d 914 (Fourth Circuit, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 F.2d 63, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-h-sharpe-v-united-states-ca4-1959.