Dominy v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 6, 2025·No. 7:25-cv-01279·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VINCENT M. DOMINY, Plaintiff, 25-CV-1279 (JGLC) -against- ORDER OF SERVICE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. JESSICA G. L. CLARKE, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who currently is incarcerated at F.C.I. Otisville, brings this action pro se under the Federal Tort Claims Act. By order dated February 14, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees.1 0F Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.2 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 1F (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendant United States through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for Defendant, and check the box labeled “Check

1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 2 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have effected service until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that any summons be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date any summons issues. for service on U.S.A.” The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendant. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons is issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue a summons for Defendant the United States of America, complete the USM-285 form and check the box on the form labeled “Check for service on U.S.A,” and deliver all documents? necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. Dated: August 6, 2025 New York, New York

SO ORDERED.

( JESSICA G. L. CLARKE United States District Judge

> The Clerk of Court is directed to include in the service materials the original complaint and the amended complaint (ECF 1, 7) as the operative pleading.

SERVICE ADDRESSES United States of America 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Civil Division 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor New York, NY 10007 Federal Bureau of Prisons 320 First Street, NW Washington, DC 20534

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dominy v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Dominy v. United States (Dominy v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)