Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis

243 A.D.2d 429, 667 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10830
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D.2d 278

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered on or about March 21, 1997, which denied defendants’ motion, pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (2) and (3), to vacate the judgment entered February 26, 1996, on defendants’ default, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1,250,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Sanctions in the amount of $2,500 are imposed against Richard Kranis, payable to the Clerk of the Court for transmittal to the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance.

Since the arguments presented in this action for legal malpractice have been disposed of on prior appeals (205 AD2d 411; 215 AD2d 278; 237 AD2d 232), defendants are precluded from relitigating the issues of plaintiff’s standing and alleged double recovery.

Due to the frivolous nature of this appeal from the denial of the CPLR 5015 motion, including, in particular, appellants’ repetition of arguments previously rejected, sanctions in the amount of $2,500 are warranted (22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Williams and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis, 243 A.D.2d 429, 667 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 429 (Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis
215 A.D.2d 278 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis
237 A.D.2d 232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)