Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis

237 A.D.2d 232, 655 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 232 (Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Domino Media, Inc. v. Kranis, 237 A.D.2d 232, 655 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about February 26, 1996, awarding plaintiff the principal amount of $1,250,000, in an action for legal malpractice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Following this Court’s prior rulings in this matter (205 AD2d 411; 215 AD2d 278), the only question remaining was the amount of damages demonstrated at the inquest of August 5, 1993. The record of that proceeding amply supports the trial court’s finding that plaintiff sustained business losses in excess of defendants’ policy limit of $1,250,000, and, therefore, the trial court properly awarded that amount. Defendants’ arguments either improperly address the merits of matters already disposed of on the prior appeals or improperly raise points for the first time on appeal, and, in any event, are without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about February 26, 1996, awarding plaintiff the principal amount of $1,250,000, in an action for legal malpractice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Following this Court’s prior rulings in this matter (205 AD2d 411; 215 AD2d 278), the only question remaining was the amount of damages demonstrated at the inquest of August 5, 1993. The record of that proceeding amply supports the trial court’s finding that plaintiff sustained business losses in excess of defendants’ policy limit of $1,250,000, and, therefore, the trial court properly awarded that amount. Defendants’ arguments either improperly address the merits of matters already disposed of on the prior appeals or improperly raise points for the first time on appeal, and, in any event, are without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D.2d 232, 655 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/domino-media-inc-v-kranis-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack