Home/California Supreme Court/Doerfler v. Schmidt

Doerfler v. Schmidt

30 P. 816, 64 Cal. 265, 12 P.C.L.J. 299, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 621
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 29, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 30 P. 816 (Doerfler v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doerfler v. Schmidt, 30 P. 816, 64 Cal. 265, 12 P.C.L.J. 299, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 621 (Cal. 1883).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The proof of service of the summons was insufficient. Maynard v. McCrellish, 57 Cal. 355, was decided' upon a similar state of attempted proof. The statement in the affidavit used on the motion to set aside the default cannot be deemed a waiver of the service. We cannot look beyond the judgment roll for the purpose of ascertaining the validity of the judgment.

It is argued that the complaint does not state facts sufficient [266]*266to constitute a cause of action, in that it does not aver a delivery of the deed. We think the point is well taken.

Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Windle, Adm'x v. Flinn
251 P.2d 136 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1952)
Rivera v. de Arce
55 P.R. 323 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1939)
Buonomo v. Succession of Juncos
28 P.R. 380 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1920)
Buonomo v. Sucesión Juncos
28 P.R. Dec. 409 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1920)
Scholle v. Finnell
159 P. 1179 (California Supreme Court, 1916)
Andino v. Knight
20 P.R. 185 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1914)
People v. Disperati
105 P. 617 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)
Blackman v. Schierman
51 S.W. 886 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1899)
Layton v. Trapp
52 P. 208 (Montana Supreme Court, 1898)
Horton v. Gallardo
26 P. 375 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Perri v. Beaumont
25 P. 1109 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Barney v. Vigoureaux
17 P. 433 (California Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 P. 816, 64 Cal. 265, 12 P.C.L.J. 299, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doerfler-v-schmidt-cal-1883.