Doepke v. Doepke
Opinion
Filed 2/3/09 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2009 ND 2
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Curtis Lee Cahoon, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20080173
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Pamela A. Nesvig, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5518, Bismarck, ND 58506-5518, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Cahoon
No. 20080173
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Curtis Cahoon appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order. On appeal, Cahoon argued the district court erred when it denied his motion for judgment of acquittal, contending there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2009 ND 10 (Doepke v. Doepke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.