Renville v. Renville

2010 ND 200
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 22, 2010
Docket20090343
StatusPublished

This text of 2010 ND 200 (Renville v. Renville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Renville v. Renville, 2010 ND 200 (N.D. 2010).

Opinion

Filed 10/22/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2010 ND 200

Cheryl Renville, Plaintiff, Appellee and Cross-Appellant

v.

Carl Renville, Defendant, Appellant and Cross-Appellee

No. 20090343

Appeal from the District Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable David W. Nelson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kevin J. Chapman, P.O. Box 1920, Williston, N.D. 58802-1920, for plaintiff, appellee and cross-appellant.

H. Malcolm Pippin, P.O. Box 1525, Williston, N.D. 58802-1525, for defendant, appellant and cross-appellee.

Renville v. Renville

[¶1] Carl Renville appeals, and Cheryl Renville cross-appeals, from the trial court’s judgment granting the parties a divorce and dividing the marital property.  On appeal, Carl Renville argues the trial court erred in its valuation of the parties’ business.  A trial court’s property valuation is presumed correct and will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous.   Evenson v. Evenson , 2007 ND 194, ¶ 6, 742 N.W.2d 829.  “‘Marital property valuations within the range of evidence presented to the trial court are not clearly erroneous.’”   Id. (quoting Olson v. Olson , 2002 ND 30, ¶ 7, 639 N.W.2d 701).  Because the trial court’s valuation of the parties’ business was within the range of evidence presented at trial, we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

[¶2] Both parties request an award of attorney’s fees and costs on appeal.  However, neither party provides any basis or support for such an award.  The parties’ requests for attorney’s fees and costs are, therefore, denied.   See Doepke v. Doepke , 2009 ND 10, ¶ 21, 760 N.W.2d 131 (denying a request for attorney’s fees when the party failed to provide any support for the request).

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

John C. Irby, D.J.

[¶4] The Honorable John C. Irby, D.J., sitting in place of Crothers, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olson v. Olson
2002 ND 30 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2002)
Evenson v. Evenson
2007 ND 194 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2007)
Doepke v. Doepke
2009 ND 10 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)
Doepke v. Doepke
2009 ND 10 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2010 ND 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renville-v-renville-nd-2010.