Doe v. Reivitz
842 F.2d 194, 1988 WL 24822
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 22, 1988
DocketNos. 86-2350, 86-2561
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 842 F.2d 194 (Doe v. Reivitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Doe v. Reivitz, 842 F.2d 194, 1988 WL 24822 (7th Cir. 1988).
Opinion
ORDER
The court, sua sponte, amends the opinion in the above-entitled cause, issued September 28, 1987, 830 F.2d 1441 (7th Cir.1987), by adding the following language to footnote 11 at page 1448 of the opinion:
After we issued our opinion in this case, we received a letter from plaintiffs’ counsel suggesting that some of the above-cited sections apply to the Wisconsin program since that program is not entirely a general WIN program. Neither the state nor the federal government, however, filed a petition for rehearing, and this portion of our statutory analysis remains applicable to the extent the program is a general WIN program. Further, nothing in the letter casts any doubt on the remainder of our analysis or on the result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lewis v. Grinker
111 F. Supp. 2d 142 (E.D. New York, 2000)
Miami Nation of Indians of Indiana, Inc. v. Babbitt
887 F. Supp. 1158 (N.D. Indiana, 1995)
Wagner Seed Company, Inc. v. George Bush, as President of the United States of America
946 F.2d 918 (D.C. Circuit, 1991)
32 soc.sec.rep.ser. 494, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 15908a Esther Marcus v. Louis v. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services
926 F.2d 604 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
842 F.2d 194, 1988 WL 24822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-reivitz-ca7-1988.