Doe v. City of Trenton
This text of 380 A.2d 703 (Doe v. City of Trenton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR SON, A.A., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CITY OF TRENTON, MUNICIPAL COURT OF CITY OF TRENTON, TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT AND GEORGE DOUGHERTY, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF TRENTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. George T. Dougherty, City Attorney for the City of Trenton, argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. Dennis S. Brotman argued the cause for respondent (Ms. Alice Ashley Costello, Director, Legal Aid Society of Mercer County, attorney).
Mr. Steven Zamrin, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for amicus curiae Office of Public Defender, Child Advocacy Unit (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
Messrs. Horowitz, Bross and Sinins submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union (Mr. Alan Y. Medvin, of counsel and on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 143 N.J. Super. 128.
*138 For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER 6.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
380 A.2d 703, 75 N.J. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-city-of-trenton-nj-1977.