Doe v. City Of New York

S.D. New York

Doe v. City Of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 3, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-06322·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED:_8/3/2020 JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, 1:19-ev-06322-MKV -against- ORDER OF CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., DISMISSAL. Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: It having been reported to this Court by the Parties that this case has been settled, it is hereby ORDERED that the Post-Discovery Conference scheduled for August 5, 2020 is adjourned sine die. IT IF FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by September 5, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / lene Date: August 3, 2020 MaRy(faY vvfsocd New York, NY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED:_8/3/2020 JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, 1:19-ev-06322-MKV -against- ORDER OF CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., DISMISSAL. Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: It having been reported to this Court by the Parties that this case has been settled, it is hereby ORDERED that the Post-Discovery Conference scheduled for August 5, 2020 is adjourned sine die. IT IF FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by September 5, 2020. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / lene Date: August 3, 2020 MaRy(faY vvfsocd New York, NY United States District Judge

Doe v. City Of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Doe v. City Of New York (Doe v. City Of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related