Doe v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 19, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-09338·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, 19-CV-9338 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL NYC DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated October 10, 2019, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $400.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fee. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: November 19, 2019 New York, New York hie. Iu Wyk COLLEEN McMAHON Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Doe v. City of New York (Doe v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)