Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept.

Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 6

7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of Minor No: 2:20-cv-02248-TLN-DMC 12 A, Minor B, and Minor C, ORDER 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 BUTTE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT; ROXANNE LARA; and 17 DAWN HOROWITZ-PERSON,

18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Before this Court is Defendants Butte County Probation Department and Roxanne Lara’s 22 (“Defendants”) Request to Seal Documents. (ECF No. 39-1.) The Court has reviewed Defendants’ 23 Request. Pursuant to the Court’s January 5, 2021 Order granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Under 24 Pseudonyms and to Redact or Seal Identifying Documents (ECF No. 28) and good cause appearing, 25 Defendants’ Request is hereby GRANTED. See, e.g., Four in One Co. v. S.K. Foods, L.P., No. 2:08- 26 cv-03017-KJM-EFB, 2014 WL 4078232, at *2 n.1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014). 27 The Clerk of the Court is directed to SEAL the Declarations of Candice Carr and Roxanne Lara 28 filed in support of Defendants’ Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (See ECF No. 39.) 1 || These documents shall remain under seal for the duration of this litigation unless and until further order 2 || of the Court. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 || Dated: February 9, 2021 /) Say Vs

8 Troy L. Nuhlep> United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

a ee