Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of Minor No: 2:20-cv-02248-TLN-DMC A, Minor B, and Minor C, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT; ROXANNE LARA; and
Defendants. Before this Court is Defendants Butte County Probation Department and Roxanne Lara’s (“Defendants”) Request to Seal Documents. (ECF No. 39-1.) The Court has reviewed Defendants’ Request. Pursuant to the Court’s January 5, 2021 Order granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonyms and to Redact or Seal Identifying Documents (ECF No. 28) and good cause appearing, Defendants’ Request is hereby GRANTED. See, e.g., Four in One Co. v. S.K. Foods, L.P., No. 2:08- cv-03017-KJM-EFB, 2014 WL 4078232, at *2 n.1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014). The Clerk of the Court is directed to SEAL the Declarations of Candice Carr and Roxanne Lara filed in support of Defendants’ Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (See ECF No. 39.) These documents shall remain under seal for the duration of this litigation unless and until further order of the Court. Dated: February 9, 2021 /) Say Vs
Troy L. Nuhlep> United States District Judge
a ee
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept. (Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.