Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept.
Opinion
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of Minor No: 2:20-cv-02248-TLN-DMC 12 A, Minor B, and Minor C, ORDER 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 BUTTE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT; ROXANNE LARA; and 17 DAWN HOROWITZ-PERSON,
18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Before this Court is Plaintiff John Doe’s (“Plaintiff”) Request to Seal Documents. (ECF No. 22 31-2.) The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Request and the supporting declaration of counsel. Pursuant 23 to the Court’s January 5, 2021 Order granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonyms and to 24 Redact or Seal Identifying Documents (ECF No. 28) and good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s Request is 25 hereby GRANTED. See, e.g., Four in One Co. v. S.K. Foods, L.P., No. 2:08-cv-03017-KJM-EFB, 26 2014 WL 4078232, at *2 n.1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014). 27 The Clerk of the Court is directed to SEAL Exhibits 1–2 attached to the Declaration of 28 Susannah Lund in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed on January 6, 2021. 1 (See ECF No. 31-1.) These documents shall remain under seal for the duration of this litigation unless 2 and until further order of the Court. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: January 13, 2021 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept. (Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.