Dodson v. Dodson

46 A.D.3d 305, 846 N.Y.S.2d 576
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 2007·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Vistacion-Lewis, J.), entered August 17, 2006, which awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $50,000 in interim counsel fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The determination of an application for interim attorney fees in a divorce action is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court (Matter of Aronesty v Aronesty, 202 AD2d 240 [1994]). The court providently exercised its discretion in rendering this award, which appropriately redresses the parties’ economic disparity, and which is subject to reexamination at trial (see Jorgensen v Jorgensen, 86 AD2d 861 [1982]). We have considered the remainder of defendant’s argument and find it unavailing. Concur—Marlow, J.P., Nardelli, Williams and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodson v. Dodson, 46 A.D.3d 305, 846 N.Y.S.2d 576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

46 A.D.3d 305 (Dodson v. Dodson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nacos v. Nacos
96 A.D.3d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Kiwon S. v. Daniel S.
95 A.D.3d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Palmeri v. Palmeri
87 A.D.3d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Coven v. Coven
82 A.D.3d 1144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)