Dodge v. City of New York
This text of 14 N.E.2d 837 (Dodge v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the submission of controversy the parties stipulated that “ plaintiff did not write upon his payroll receipts for the period from January 1, 1934 to June 30, 1937 that the amount received by him was *28 received under protest.” Under the provisions of section 149 of the Charter of the City of New York (Laws 1901, ch. 466, as amd.) there can be no recovery upon any further claim for salary. (See opinion in Quayle v. City of New York, 278 N. Y. 19, decided herewith.) We do not pass upon any other question.
The judgment should be reversed and (the complaint dismissed, without costs. (See 278 N. Y. 599.)
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 N.E.2d 837, 278 N.Y. 25, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodge-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1938.