Dodd v. Taylor
This text of 218 A.D. 862 (Dodd v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Peremptory mandamus order modified by providing that an alternative mandamus order shall issue, with costs to abide the event. The record before us presents a question of fact that should be tried out by an alternative order as to whether or not, under the provisions of the Building Code (Art. 1, § 4, subd. 4) work was commenced within one year from the time of the issuance of the permit. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., dissents, and votes for reversal of the order and a denial of the motion, upon the ground that the papers do not show that petitioner is entitled to relief by mandamus.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 A.D. 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodd-v-taylor-nyappdiv-1926.