D.M.J. v. State

36 So. 3d 895, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8175
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2010·No. No. 1D09-5740·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes that the trial court erroneously denied appellant’s motion to suppress a weapon found on his person. See Baptiste v. State, 995 So.2d 285 (Fla.2008).

Reversed and remanded with directions to enter an order granting appellant’s motion to suppress.

WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.M.J. v. State, 36 So. 3d 895, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8175 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

36 So. 3d 895 (D.M.J. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DMJ v. State
36 So. 3d 895 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)