D.M. v. County of Merced

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9| D.M., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00409-JLT-SAB 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 V. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 12 | COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 180) 14 15 On November 18, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice. 16 | (ECF No. 180.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. 17 | Civ. P. 41(a).)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 18 | been dismissed with prejudice. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close the file in this case and 20 | adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. 93 | Dated: _November 19, 2024 ; STANLEY A. BOONE 24 United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28